Order Your Copy of BP’s latest Issue

Issue 14

STICKY POST!  SCROLL DOWN for blog views and news….

Issue 14 is out now! Don’t miss Black Poppy’s unique hard copy magazine -available now and posted to anywhere in the world. Catch up on the latest news, views and lifestyle issues with one of the worlds best loved drug user magazines; exclusively created and produced by users for users.   If drugs influence your lifestyle – then you need BP magazine for the latest news, stories and articles on drug use. Click here for more info on the mag and whats inside.

OR Click here to go directly to order your copy

The Incredible Story behind ‘The Frozen Addicts’

English: MPPP; 1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxyp...

MPPP; 1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine, desmethylprodine Deutsch: 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-4-propion-oxy-piperidin; 3-Desmethylprodin or synthetic heroin -however one mistake in the lab and it becomes an injectable nightmare.  (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A nightmare of immense proportions for any opiate user watching this film. Watch the simply mindblowing film about a handful of opiate users in California in the early 1980′s who, after injecting what they thought was heroin, woke up completely frozen – in body and voice – but not mind. Locked into a prison of their own bodies, their stories confounded doctors until bit by bit they managed to unravel what had happened to them and so began the long, long road as they endeavored to cure them of their condition, despite at times creating other situations that were as bad if not worse than the original Parkinson-like condition they initially faced.

Crucially, I think it is worth mentioning that the underground chemist who was trying to manufactuer a synthetic form of heroin known as MPPP, rushed the process and came up with something called MPTP, a drug that destroyed peoples dopamine receptors, leaving them unable to produce dopamine and thus leaving them frozen in their bodies. See text below the video for link to information on MPTP and MPPP. This is yet another byproduct of prohibition, where the law allows underground labs to flourish and horrendous mistakes like this to occur. This is not to say mistakes don’t occur in big pharma although in general, research techniques ensure such enormous problems are found before such drugs find their way to market. You can also follow up the stories of these amazing individuals whom our hearts go out to, on google etc.

<iframe width=”420″ height=”315″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/RyXXRG_UqBM&#8221; frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen>

NOTE on MPPP and MTPT: While MPTP itself has no psychoactive effects, the compound may be accidentally produced during the manufacture ofMPPP, a synthetic opioid drug with effects similar to those of morphine and pethidine (meperidine). The Parkinson-inducing effects of MPTP were first discovered following accidental ingestion as a result of contaminated MPPP. For more info on MPTP and MPPP, click here.

Here we go again; sweeping up the junkie mess in time for the glowingly healthy & happy Olympics; Brazilian Stylee

Hey readers, just check out this news article from Brazil. Enforced treatment not only goes against every tenet of the therapeutic relationship which has at its crux that one can’t force change on anyone who isn’t a willing, consenting partner -let alone the ethical issues at the heart of this. Enforced treatment rears its ugly head over and over again, emerging often in all manner of forms from the mildly menacing “‘we’re not forcing you exactly but if you don’t do xyz you won’t get help/housing/support/treatment etc” to the outright being kidnapped in the middle of the night and locked up in a ‘treatment facility’ with no recourse or redress. Yes, this all happens -but it is yet another story. This one is about Rio in Brazil, which has followed a programme first implemented in Brazil in Sao Paulo -and although there is clearly no evidence base for this kind of incarceration as a ‘treatment’, Rio nevertheless rolls out the rehab carpet. Go directly to rehab. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. Being brought by ones parent’s or family members, which is often offered up to us as reasonable force or ‘encouragement’ can also be highly dubious, more realistically occurring as a punishment for the wayward child, who attends as a display of remorse or guilt to the family rather than a real desire or ability to get off drugs at what is often a crisis in that persons life that precipitates the heated fights and tears of the ‘pre rehab familial tsunami’. Breaking point for one side or the other ensues and rehab is raised, the bags packed. Of course as the article states, there is NO evidence for this kind of treatment approach, which isn’t to say it is all about baby steps and lots of cuddles (although that would be more effective than the former, I’m sure).  It is a convoluted mixture of approaches, which need to be guided by the individual who needs to believe in their own power to create the changes that lead to a better life; but to have some options of a better life being a possibility. And some support if needed to get there. After all, as one junkie I know said, “When you’re on the bottom rung of the ladder, everything is above you”. Firstly though – we have to stop treating drug users like they can be just swept away when the Olympics or some such event passes by our cities. Treated like they are the dirt on the new shoes of the up and coming new city suburbs. To believe in themselves, we have to believe in them. They are, after all -our sons, our daughters, mums, dads, grandpas and grandmas, our cousins and our husbands and wives. A selfish society or an impatient one, is destined to fall on its face in the muddy streets of its crime filled cities. No help to anybody. Yes it gets messy, yes there are countries, cities and towns where the picture is more harrowing than one could ever imagine. But our old approaches just arent working anymore. How many times must we throw money and our heads against brick walls? Involve people who use drugs to find out new answers, ask them their thoughts and opinions, provide the mechanisms to get their voices heard and their ideas developed. Engage the community you are targeting, it works – don’t just lock them up out of sight.

Issue CCXII – Weekly Edition: April 3 – April 9, 2013

Forced Treatment for Brazil Crack Addicts

February 26, 2013 | Filed underFront Page,Politics | Posted by 

By Lucy Jordan, Senior Contributing Reporter

BRASÍLIA, BRAZIL – In an attempt to tackle Brazil’s growing crack epidemic, the city of Rio de Janeiro has begun a program of involuntary hospitalization for users, one month after Brazil’s biggest city São Paulo began a similar program. At least 99 addicts have been hospitalized, 29 involuntarily, since the program launched one week ago, according to local media tallies.

Officials say that most of those hospitalized for crack addiction in São Paulo since involuntary treatment was introduced have come voluntarily, or been brought by family members, photo by Marcelo Camargo/ABr.

With its long, porous border adjoining the world’s top three drug producers – Bolivia, Peru and Colombia – Brazil has historically been a transit country for drug trafficking to the U.S. and Europe.

Yet increasingly, Brazil has become a drug destination, with a Federal University of São Paulo study released last year showing that Brazil is now possibly the world’s largest market for crack-cocaine, with as many as one million users.

Some feel it it the approaching 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics that has prompted officials to ramp up efforts to present a clean, safe, tourist-friendly image.

Critics say that forcing addicts into rehabilitation treatment is ineffective, as the vast majority of users will quickly start using drugs again once discharged.

“When an addict is interned unwillingly, he can remain abstinent as long as he remains hospitalized,” Psychiatrist Dartiu Xavier da Silveira, who coordinates the renowned Guidance and Treatment of Addiction program of the Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp), told The Rio Times.

“When he returns to his normal life (and his usual problems), the vast majority of users go back to using the drug as before,” Professor Silveira added. “Proposals for compulsory hospitalization as a measure of public health has no support in scientific evidence.”

Ronaldo Laranjeira, who heads up Unifesp’s Research Unit on Alcohol and Drugs and is a leading authority on the subject, said that the nature of crack addiction is so extreme that ordinary addiction treatment is inappropriate, and patients should be treated as psychiatric patients.

Critics of involuntary hospitalization say that without adequate treatment following detox, most addicts will begin using again, photo by Tânia Rêgo/ABr.

“In terms of crack users, the cases are so severe, people are so aggressive, so impulsive, sometimes psychotic, for me they are [not just addicts but] severe cases of psychiatric diseases,” he told The Rio Times. “That’s why for many people we have to use involuntary admission.”

“The clinical structure we have is basically only outpatients’ clinics and they cannot cope with these more severe cases,” he added. Long-term, Professor Laranjeira says that more specialized clinics for chemical dependency are required.

Professor Silveira agrees that involuntary hospitalization is appropriate for some patients who present psychiatric problems, but says these patients make up less than fifteen percent of crack addicts.

Brazil is by no means the first country to try coercive treatment for drug addiction. It is particularly common in Asia, and in the United States, some studies have shown that as much as fifty percent of publicly funded drug treatment referrals come from the criminal justice system. Coercive treatment for psychiatric treatment is common in much of Europe and the U.S.

In Dec 2011, the federal government launched a R$4 billion program to tackle the spread of crack-cocaine, focusing on prevention, care and policing. Health Minister Alexandre Padilha called the problem an “epidemic” and said drug addiction in Brazil had increased ten-fold between 2003 and 2011.

However, Professor Laranjeira said that very little of that money has actually reached state governments, and that this could adversely affect Rio’s ability to cope with demand for beds. “São Paulo has nearly a thousand beds for chemical dependency treatment; Rio doesn’t have even fifty,” he said.

“The huge contrast between Rio and São Paulo is that in São Paulo they are using state money to finance this service while in Rio they are relying too much on the federal government, and the money the federal government is putting on this treatment of crack is very small.”

Since São Paulo started its program in mid-January, 223 people have been admitted to hospital, but only seventeen of the admissions were involuntary.

END

 

Note: here are a few snippets from the recent Sao Paulo Study;

Altogether, more than six million Brazilians have tried cocaine or its derivatives at any point during their life, research by the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa de Políticas Públicas do Álcool e Outras Drogas (National Institute for Public Policy Research on Alcohol and Other Drugs, INPAD) at the Federal University of São Paulo showed.

Of this group, two million have at some point usedcrackoxi or merla – two other highly destructive derivatives of cocaine, usually cut with gasoline or other household solvents – while one million had used at least one of these three drugs during the past year.

The research also showed that in the past twelve months to between January and March 2012….2.6 million adults and 244,000 young Brazilians consumed cocaine in some form.

Of these, 78 percent sniffed powdered cocaine, five percent smoked derivatives, and seventeen percent used the drug in both these ways. Some 27 percent of these used daily or more than twice a week and fourteen percent said that at some point they had used the drug intravenously

 

 

 

 

Avoiding Hepatitis C / HIV – Tips from your peers

An article based on a research paper

by Sam Friedman et al.

Looking at How Some IV Users Manage to

Become ‘Double Negatives’.

In some climates where disturbingly high rates of infection exist, what key things are people doing in their daily using lives that conspire to keep them free from infection when so many of our  peers become positive. Sam Friedman et al looked into this subject and found some consistent factors

A brief BP comment before we introduce Sams article; We are always focusing on just HOW we end up getting blood borne viruses, and many of us have ended up getting, if not HIV then much more commonly, Hepatitis C (or B) -in some countries or prisons Hep C rates can be as high as 70-90% of all injectors. Yet we all know people who have managed to inject drugs for decades yet have avoided becoming infected with anything. Sam Friedman et al has turned the usual research approach  on its head here and put our own drug using culture under the microscope – searching for the little gems -those habits or behaviours that WE have utilised to keep us safe from such  infections, regardless of how long one has been injecting.

This is not about focusing on what ‘they did right and you did wrong’. No, this is about pulling

Negative (Negative album)

Sam Friedman’s research into the ‘Double Negatives’

together the cultural threads and day to day choices one can make that helps to create the environment you need to protect your health. It is interesting to see how adopting a few strategies around your using lifestyle, can work to protect you from what can be extremely common infections. Of course in a world of prohibition, opportunities to choose a safer path can change dramatically overnight, such as a stay in prison. Sometimes, with all the knowledge and support in the world, you can just be damn unlucky, or have no control over transmission events.

However, it is worth looking at Friedmans research to see, against just such a prohibitionist backdrop,  with perils around almost every corner, how our negative peers manage to stay negative -leaving us with the thought; “Can I incorporate some of these tactics/strategies/principles/street codes into my using life? Well yes you can -and all of these ‘tips’ are just as relevant for a positive person as well – after all, who wants to get re-infected? So, enough of the prologue, take it away Sam! PS -BP has added the odd hopefully useful comment in italics.

Staying Safe: How you and others might

avoid becoming infected with hepatitis C or

HIV?

Most people who inject drugs get infected with hepatitis C within a few years (often their first few years of IV using). Some also get infected with HIV. This happens in spite of all the syringe exchange, pharmacy syringe distribution programs, drug treatment, and other harm reduction efforts they engage in—and all the ways they help each other to have safer and happier lives.

“Some people who inject drugs do NOT seem to

get infected with either virus.

What are their resources or strategies?

How might you, your friends or your children

learn from how they did it?”

To read the full article and pick up a few tips, click here.

Now we said it would be complicated…..

Look,

A life without using chemical substances is impossible virtually lets face it (coffee, steroid creams, painkillers etc) -and but a life without using ‘culturally unacceptable‘ drugs is the new fashion that has permeated the globe, reeking of neo conservatism and the judgemental vision of god. For a while at leas

I would really like to be listened to sometime about what I would like to help ME get my shit together. Because it isn’t because of drugs primarily (granted they can make it harder at times) it the curse of fucking life.

Life is a painful slingshot…. sitting there, waiting – it is all yours, in your sack you carry on your back, and you stand looking over the Mediterranean – it is your life, in your slingshot, and there you are, about to propel your dreams over the cliffs into eternity with the power of a gladiator of Greece (the Ancient Greece , you get me?) and love and beautiful things and words, and sharing and and , and….

I know what I want to say. Just because I am a person who doesnt get into the AA/ NA methodologies  Im not a person that thinks that mental health problems have no role to play in the lives of people who use drugs. Jeezus Christ it has ripped my eyes out of my head to see mental health problems being exacerbated by illegal drugs – but, just as -if not more importantly and statistically more predominant; the pharmacological contraindications….In other words, one pharmacists given drug interacting BADLY with another pharmaceutical drug.

Went I finally went to America, NYC 3 times just for short work calls sponsored by UNAIDS at the time (Thanks guys x) I was bowled over by the amount of INSURANCE, DRUG COMPANY, CAR COMMERCIALS. I could not believe what i was seeing. It just all rolled up into a ball and i became more scared than Id ever been. What sort of democracy is that? What SHIT is their global satellite companies going to spread to everyone else….What Murdoch bullshit, lies and propaganda next time. Lets just pray they are sweating in their beds and having sleepless nights -and have started taking pills to help them slepp, and then wake up…just a little one you know….

Recovery ain’t what i’m going to be doing, whether I stop using or not!

My life doesnt need your little ‘groups’ that you decide will work coz they have in the past. So has washing under your armpits!

I feel, to get to be useful with the ageing population of heroin and serious -and im gonna say it coz i can – hardcore’  old school older users over 50 odd, that we have in this county. That don’t use all that now of course, some still shock you though and binges are common – just like you were 27 again. But you ain’t. And we are dying from nobody really noticing that we are growing old – and some of, well, are in some serious states. Often alone.

 

I’m seeing a hell of a lot of medical problems come up that taking WAY too long to treat;  - considering they go to see a GP or clinic ever bloody TWO FUCKIN WEEKS to pick up their methadone prescription.

 

You know what we need? Mum and I talked about this is the car  just recently.

We need peer advocates (as they did Melbourne) that  could work with a team  at hospital ( in particular LIVER or HIV specific units) . This trained peer support located for special appointment days – someone located at a community health centre (or a drug centre I suppose seeing as we are so used to using them for anything and everything these days).

But someone – a trained peer or generally empathetic advocate -to go with you to doctors appointments, ask for information, be a record – advocate.

All these years later and we are still getting our medical issues ignored – yes because we want to ignore them too – but if some medic took a bit of care, took the time to ask questions, look like they cared, talked about your medical issues clearly, well, I guarantee that the person would show interest – and interest to look after their health.

But the fact is – when you have nothing and no one, its too hard to care about yourself. But thats why we need advcates. To go and pick up the person for their appointment, go with them, go into the drs with them, and keeps you from getting fucked over. Which can happen by busy drs who want the research but dont care at all about you.

Anyway, I was reminded by a brilliant Drug User Union that is doing exactly that! In a state in America – Ill find the link. I am sure there is more of you. Such a small thing to do could mean the difference between finishing or maintaining treeatment or not _ Hep C I mean but HIV will have different needs). Ill get the link and be back.

don’t mean to go on…..

 

 

 

Just something that made me smile…

I stumbled across this on that awesome website Opioids.com where a single link can lead to to places and dark corners within drugs and the brain you were always suspecting were in there somewhere but couldn’t follow enough leads! This quote is from a site linked to http://opioids.com  as you’ll come across some fascinating snippets and in depth research, totally for the all consuming trainspotter. Well here it is, its a bit daunting in technicality to start, but persevere.

0.4 Life In Dopaminergic Overdrive.

An important point to stress in the discussion to follow is that many dopamine-driven states of euphoria can actually enhance motivated, goal-directed behaviour in general. Enhanced dopamine function makes one’s motivation to act stronger, not weaker. Hyper-dopaminergic states tend also to increase the range of activities an organism finds worth pursuing.

Outside the pleasure-laboratory, such states of necessity focus on countless different intentional objects. So humanity’s future as envisaged in this manifesto is not, or certainly not just, an eternity spent enraptured on elixirs of super-soma or tanked up on high-octane pleasure-machines. Nor is it plausible that posterity will enjoy only the dullish, opiated sensibility of the heroin addict. Instead, an extraordinarily fertile range of purposeful and productive activities will most likely be pursued. Better still, our descendants, and in principle perhaps even our elderly selves, will have the chance to enjoy modes of experience we primitives cruelly lack. For on offer are sights more majestically beautiful, music more deeply soul-stirring, sex more exquisitely erotic, mystical epiphanies more awe-inspiring, and love more profoundly intense than anything we can now properly comprehend. I shall first schematically set out how a naturalistic, secular paradise of effectively everlasting happiness is biotechnically feasible.

Second, I will argue why its realisation is instrumentally rational and ethically mandatory.

Third, I will offer a sketch of when and why such a scenario is likely to come to pass in some guise or other. And, finally, I shall try to anticipate some of the most common if not always cogent objections that the prospect of psychochemical nirvana is likely to arouse, and attempt to defuse them.

(He has loads more written and I’ve lost the link direct, forgive me ill be fixing asap and huge apologies to the author.

RECOVERING FROM RECOVERY RANT

…Help, someone, anyone, gimme something to get that taste out of my mouth!

I’ve just been mooching around the British recovery policy arrow . That all want us to RECOVER. They all want us to hurry along off that awful substitute drug methadone or whatever dulls your senses, and step into real life, the good life, the real shiny happy coloured world.

I’m seeing David Cameron, sitting there in his living room, talking intensly about ‘how to deal with this country’s drug problem’ about how Labour just left us all sitting on methadone by a policy drafted and financially driven ‘bums on clinic seats’ kinda approach (amongst other things).

In a way, it worked. EVERYONE got a ‘script. EVERYONE who went near heroin got a methadone or Suboxone (in fashion pharmaceutically with the Gov these days) prescription and got off the crazy merry go round of hunting for dope 24-7.

But I could go on and on about what I thought of the last governments policies and where we went wrong and right – and we definitely did – for the first time ever – make some right decisions with the drug users welfare in mind -and occasionally involved in that as well! Movement!

But my RANT for today……

I am soooooo sick of the way we are supposed to go to ‘health professionals’ for ‘recovery’. More money thrown at them (for us you understand).

They pull out their research statistics -most of which are dubious (we could tell you that if we were ar these meetings or were there designing the research with you).

RECOVERY has become religious. Like a light we have to follow to ‘come and accept the truth and waljk through the recovery door into the light…..’

STOP! WE are making a mistake! support us if you must -but support us to be a community – to support each other, to decide for ourselves what kinda warm and fuzzy workshops we want to attend on the way to our new life….I mean please! We are all individuals. WE need what everyone needs to make it;

We need a purpose.

We need love and support

We need community, family, bridges healed, bridges left behind.

We need to be able to deal with anxiety, pressure, deadlines, responsibility without always using drugs. Sometimes it might be appropriate but we need to know when that is and when that isnt. A joint in bed after a mental nites work -what the fuck is wrong with that?

We need to feel like we are contributing to something useful, that we are giving something useful to our community. We need to focus on these things – not be held up like a ‘recovery champion’.

Its embarrassing, its patronising, it is demeaning; it makes the service feel good. Especcially when they have their big ‘event day’.

‘Here we are, look commissioner, look at our guy/girl -and hear their story of where they have come from (the gutter of course) to how, with the help of their drug service, they are a new person, they have their lives back and even their children. We all well up, stuff a chip in our mouths, drink the free wine (oops, no alcohol at these kind of events), network, and everyone feels good and wants to know how they too can replicate this service.

Why dont we ever learn? Why dont we acknowledge those who really need some serious support, practical and emotional and help them to help themselves. Support them to support each other. Peer support works well — but not run like a church with a bloody door and light at the end of the tunnel and youve never really made until you get there. drug free.

Im so sick of it all. And now london is haveing the biggest ‘RECOVERY EVENT’ in the world in January????!!! Please god!

Anthrax Warning for European Heroin Users -especially Brits

ANTHRAX WARNING -including the most up-to-date and well researched guide on the subject of ANTHRAX and the contamination of street heroin -and ARE WE AT RISK? Thanks to INPUD for the information below and their new guide.

OK, so the picture is pretty horrid but it is nothing to how bad an anthrax infection can get -along with it being FATAL for some of our heroin using peers. This is an extremely serious (sometimes fatal) infection that, although still uncommon, it continues to rear its deadly head since it first popped up on the scene a few years back. Now this affects:

INJECTORS of ALL MODES -intravenous AND intramuscular AND subcutaneous (or in street speak, mainlining, and IM (in the muscle like top of arm, front of thigh, or muscle area of bum cheek), or skin popping – right into the fat/skin (not deeper, like into the muscle).

SMOKERS – Yes, you heard right. This also affects heroin smokers.

SWALLOWING - Yep, you read it right. Read the guide for more info on gastrointestinal infection from swallowing or inserting street (anthrax spore infected) heroin (smuggling, hiding internally etc -this concerns you too!)

INPUD’s INPUT

INPUD (International Network of People who Use Drugs) have thoroughly researched the available information on anthrax spores in our street heroin and how it has been affecting users AND popping up in places across Europe, mainly Britain and have produced a brief (but thorough) guide (PDF) for print out, sharing and dissemination amongst your peers and user groups. See also INPUD’s main website and blog. (copy freely but credit INPUD!)

Just to pull out a few interesting bits, INPUD’s up to date and well researched guide for heroin users and health workers on anthrax can be found here; INPUDanthrax …

Black Poppy lifted some text from INPUD’s excellent guide in order to flesh out the background a bit -and why it should concern us, especially in the UK. INPUD’s Guide states;

“…Subsequent to the crisis in Scotland during 2009/10, where an outbreak of anthrax infected 47 people, causing 14 fatalities; further cases and deaths have been reported this year in Germany, Denmark, and France. Scotland has again been affected, with a confirmed case in Lanarkshire on 24th July this year….

……Although at the time of this publication, no further cases have been reported on the European mainland, anthrax infection continues to infect, hospitalise, and kill heroin users throughout the UK.”

It goes on to say;

“…..The spores found in the heroin responsible for the recent cases in Germany were shown to be indistinguishable from those found in the 2009/10 cases in Scotland. This suggests that the same batch of heroin could be responsible….

INPUD’s guide goes on to state clearly….

“…Research published subsequent to the 2009/10 outbreak has produced no evidence of nefarious intent, with the heroin likely being contaminated by the use of bone-meal based cutting agents, or contact with animal hides whilst in Turkey, during transit from the Afghan source…”

The guide shares a bit of background as well, which i have again copied for you here…
On the 17th June 2012, a heroin injector presented to a Berlin Hospital with symptoms of cutaneous anthrax i.e. infection at the injection site. Symptoms were black eschar (black dry scab), massive swelling, erythema (redness) and thrombosis.
Diagnosis was confirmed at the Robert Koch Institute by PCR, and serology showed that this was an anthrax infection due to the injection of an anthrax-contaminated batch of heroin.
Subsequent to the crisis in Scotland during 2009/10, where an outbreak of anthrax infected 47 people, causing 14 fatalities; further cases and deaths have been reported this year in
Germany, Denmark, and France. Scotland has again been affected, with a confirmed case in Lanarkshire on 24th July this year.

This is the best guide we have seen on this subject -

For the INPUD ANTHRAX Guide:  INPUDs Guide on ANTHRAX for heroin users
Just about everything you need to know right now about anthrax is in this guide.
Topics include;
What is anthrax?
Routes of Infection
Smuggling heroin
Can you identify it?
Can you filter out the anthrax spores?
White Vs Brown (heroin)
Signs and Symptoms
What to look out for.
Advanced Infections
Treatment
Risks to Family and Friends?
Useful links – and more. Including some very unpleasant (though real) pictures.
After thought...; Anyone who has a proven case of anthrax in any country, please dont forget (if you or a friend is able) to let your local large drug service or drug user group know about it (so we can share information, anonymous is fine of course) -or even tell us – at BP or INPUD.
It is essential these episodes are recorded -and sometimes, as we well know, we may need to do it ourselves to make sure its done and disseminated.  It wouldn’t be impossible for some medics around the entire globe to attempt to treat what might be a milder anthrax case and then not identify it or record it properly etc etc. Is it possible there could be more cases globally?? There may have been deaths not recorded accurately, (now that feels like a pretty common scenario for ‘junkies’ who die – (I’m going to be really rocking the boat here but…) 30 years experience tells me that health issues (like ulcers, COPD, necrotic skin around abscesses not treated, kept or healing  properly etc (esp if one’s homeless etc) can be overlooked because, for example, as one coroner said on camera “We leave the junkies til last because we already know they’re OD’s so it don’t take us long at the end of the day”…..I swear to God I heard a coroner say that. What if the drug user also has HIV or HCV, then they have to be kept quarantined. Hassle, hassle, hassle! Especially if they have no loved ones…What happens then if that person is covered in weeping sores and the coroner is overworked, underpaid AND a bigot -all at the same time!
No, (we need a little quiet investigation one of these days soon regarding the attitudes towards ‘junkies’ at coroners and funeral places my friends…) OK so it is rocking the boat but how many more of us to just get stamped ‘OVERDOSE’ on the death certificate when there could have been a myriad of things that precipitated that.
I know its complex, and people are busy and services short of money, but sometimes its worth remembering the very very painful reality that junkies are loathed mostly, or at least misunderstood, or for medics confronting a dead ‘opiate addict’ for example on a busy workday- suddenly shoot straight to the top (or bottom) of the pile -as a very straightforward case of an opiate overdose….How many times has that answer not provided family and friends with a believable occurrence  How many times are there no police reports clearly written out, or evidence gathered, or questions asked or investigated, friends questioned, or the personal doctors getting involved…? Let alone proper toxicology reports…
In fact – I was involved in research in Britain about 8 or 10 years back amongst coroners within the UK (or maybe it was across the 33 boroughs in London…). In any case it was voluntary for them to take part, and only a small percentage did, but what that told us was worrying. Ill dig some material out – but check out your country, ask your academic mates and allies to help; just how DO they record the number of drug related deaths in your country – and where are those results fed into?
Have an off the record chat with your local coroner, or funeral dude/dudette, morgue technician etc. Write an article about it.
Dont forget to check out http://inpud.net and http://inpud.wordpress.com

A Really Worthwhile Listen to -if you want to get up to speed on what is going on under the surface in the UK -and how we got into this abstinence mess;

A truly excellent and refreshing talk from one of the UKs most analytical, erudite, and progressive thinkers harm reduction and drug policy;  Sara McGrail presents:

Brief note: A really excellent presentation by Sara McGrail, vibrant, knowledgeable and incredibly insightful, Sara presents not only a picture of drug policy under the UK coalition -and more importantly how it affects the user on the ground. Sara also looks into what lies behind the the push behind the recovery movement, why it started, where the splits are showing, and how recovery has quickly come to mean ABSTINENCE.

Go to time splice number 16.35 in the video to find just where exactly ‘recovery’ entered the UK picture and you will see it slid in through the growing gaps of well financed treatments that were just letting the user down, and it was getting more and more obvious. Get Sara’s view on , how in the UK, splits were beginning to grow in the clinic style of maintenance and similar ‘treatment models’ and how the ‘recovery’ movement, coinciding as a new politik entered the room (soon going on to create their own splits, naturally!). Oh what an environment for all good protestant moralising and hatespeak! Just what the politicians like to wade in best!

The underlying tragedy is that the only outcome measure in our drug strategy, after an intense debate on ‘what is recovery’/ what is success’ -they have decided -point blank – that recovery is abstinence. And, dear readers, that is how services will be paid -and that is the only direction people with drug dependencies are being funnelled; abstinence. Sara also talked in the political urge to get people off treatment, with services utilising their big guns; making the service so miserable and stressful, that people would rather be on the street. ve seen it happen!) But when we start peeling back the benefit reforms we quickly find that those who return to the street wont be getting any benefits – oh no they’ll be taking those away if you don’t accept ‘treatment’. Its time to get out our pens, off our butts, networking with others and start to organise – coz otherwise we are going to lose big time readers, BIG TIME>
 So again, people who use drugs are paying for the egos and guilt of many, and today my friends, recovery, or should i say Abstinence’ is the order of the day. but really, so take out 20mins and have a listen to Sara’s talk.

One of those videos you just gotta have a listen too…

This is another terrific Exchange Supplies production -a straight up talk from a wonderful woman called Magdalena Harris. Mags, a Kiwi now living in London talks straight to camera about her life as a committed career drug user and her journey telling how she managed to pull all her experiences together and marry up her knowledge of drugs with academia. A really empowering story, Mags eloquently and succinctly takes us through her life as a street drug user – New Zealand style -with all its pharmacological nuances, to treatment and methadone which left her even more despairing as she battled the punitive ‘clinic system’. Make no mistake, this is no self pity story. This is upfront and in your face -but more than that it is extremely perceptive and Mags is able to tell us just how valuable those years of using were to the work she does today.Many will empathise with her battle with hepatitis C and her dilemma over ‘to treat or not to treat’  – and at each turn of the story you will find something you can take from it to empower, inspire, laugh or get angry. For just 15 minutes, its well worth a look readers. Nice one Mags, thanks for being so honest but more than that even, thanks for the inspiration. And thanks to Exchange Supplies for bringing us another goodie! we love you guys!

Confessions of the first modern drug taker

Thomas de Quincey, after the publication of his book ‘Confessions of an English Opium Eater’  in 1821 emerged as, it is said, as the first modern drug taker of our times, but was he really? In an era when opium was consumed for everything from the mildest cough to childbirth was De Quincey’s literary confession of opium more about historical timing and familiar titillation of the middle classes, rather than any expose of a new or intrepid drug enthusiast?

De Quincey loudly declared himself the ‘only member’ of ‘the true church on the subject of opium’ and, as if to embrace the challenge,  insisted that The English Opium Eater,  was not the same as any other opium pursuant, but rather was of a superior type: ‘I question whether any Turk, of all that ever entered the Paradise of opium-eaters, can have had half the pleasure I had’.

Drug historian Mike Jay, in his excellent article on the subject called ‘The Pope of Opium‘  adds “Although De Quincey did eat his dose on occasions, sometimes carrying a snuff-box of small opium pills, he typically (like most English people) drank it; Interestingly Jay surmises “by identifying himself as an opium-eater, he was entwining something like our modern sense of ‘recreational user’ with the sneer of a cultural outlaw, appropriating a foreign habit and deliberately courting the reader’s disapproval, even disgust“.

A friend directed me to Mike Jays piece on De Quincey’s Confessions and I found it so interesting I had to relay it here -and just for an extra buzz I have added a few bits from the classic movie ‘ Confessions of an English Opium Eater’ with Vincent Price, sure to give you a smile.

Mike Jay tells us that De Quincey now survives as the first modern drug enthusiast, through “not so much breaking a taboo as deliberately creating one by recasting a familiar practice as transgressive and culturally threatening. It was a Byronic double game: baiting the moralists and middlebrow public opinion while delighting the elite with the invention of a new vice”.

De Quincey knew he was “in the crowd but not of it”, and appealing mix of “both aristocrat and outcast” he engineered his following reflecting his own youthful and perhaps voyeuristic fascination with Coleridge and Wordsworth, falling in with the cult of the first celebrity, and perhaps defining our first ‘cool celebrity drug user’.

Jay continues in conclusion to point out that De Quincey’s entire identity was existing through his Confession’s creation, which allowed him to indulge his vice till he died at a ripe age, and to continue to play out romantic dramatisations of the confessional throughout his long and pained existence, ultimately however, to find himself losing the spark of literary vision from the weight of such soporific dependence.

Yet Jay reminds us we should not forget that Quincey’s  “harrowing portrait of the labyrinth of addiction, far in advance of the medical understanding of the day, remains unsurpassed.”

“He was, in modern parlance, a high-functioning addict: the drug enabled him to cope with the self-inflicted stresses of debt, illness and overwork, to persist in a hand-to-mouth existence, to play the victim and indulge an endless drama of persecution. His identity as the Opium Eater served as both cause and excuse for his miserable state. On the rare occasions he had money, he stopped writing and lived the life of leisure he believed to be his birthright; it was his expenditure on opium that forced him back to work, along with his need for fame. The life of the Opium Eater was a living death, but it was also immortality.”

For the entire article, well worth reading, click here. But here is a sample in brief;

 Mike Jay’s discussion on De Quincey as the first real drug enthusiast, begins with an introduction to the classic film, Confessions of an Opium-Eater

There is a little-known film entitled Confessions of an Opium-Eater, shot on a shoestring by Albert Zugsmith in 1962 and starring Vincent Price, an attempt to cash in on and extend his successful series of Edgar Allan Poe adaptations. It opens with vaseline-fogged images of a Chinese junk and a delirious Price voice-over (‘I am De Quincey…I dream…and I create dreams…out of my opium pipe…’) before clarifying that his character is in fact Gilbert De Quincey, a presumed descendent who wanders the seas as a captain-for-hire searching for ‘…well, what every man searches for’. In the Chinatown of late nineteenth-century San Francisco he is drawn into an intrigue between Tong factions that cues a breathless farrago of opium dens, secret passages, caged Oriental women, masked thugs, rooftop chases and hatchet fights: a two-fisted De Quincey against the Yellow Peril.

Beyond the passing observation that Thomas De Quincey would have applauded its racial politics, the film demonstrates two points very clearly. The first is the remarkable persistence of De Quincey the Opium-Eater as the archetype of the modern drugtaker, recognisable enough even to hook teenage audiences in the drive-ins of the southern States (Poe might have been on their school syllabus, but De Quincey surely not). The second is that this recognition depends on no element of either his life or his work beyond his name and the title of his most celebrated book.

For the rest of Mike Jays excellent article on De Quincey, click here.

Here is a terrific trailer of the original film, which will lead you to the entire film as seen on You Tube grouped in about 10 parts. Brilliant stuff.

Oh Jeez, ok here is part 1 an’ all, which gives you a direct link at the end on You Tube to the other 9. Take a chill pill and watch good ol’ Vincent Price at his finest.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 122 other followers

%d bloggers like this: